|
. |
NetApp acquires
Software-Defined Memory |
In May 2017
- A
report
on NoCamels.com said that Network Appliance
has agreed to buy Plexistor
for $20 million.
Editor's comments:- Plexistor's claim to fame
was Software-Defined Memory - with a chip agnostic approach to
SCM DIMM wars and the
memoryfication
of the enterprise.
This acquisition will enable NetApp to play around
with options on that adoption curve in speculative system offerings without
risking too much wasted software in memory dead ends | | |
.. |
|
. |
|
.. |
NetApp
acquires SolidFire |
Editor:- December 21, 2015 - Network Appliance
has agreed to acquire SolidFire for $870
million in cash according to an
announcement
today - which also said that "with SolidFire, NetApp will now have
all-flash offerings that address each of the 3 largest AFA
market
segments."
Editor's comments:- I had been expecting at
least one SSD company to be
acquired in
December as this has become something of a tradition in recent years.
| | |
.. |
|
.. |
NetApp says - the time for
taking risks with enterprise flash startups is over |
Editor:- October 1, 2014 -
Demise
of the flash startups is the provocative title of a recent blog by Craig Alger at NetApp - who
asserts that the "brief window of time where fast and agile (enterprise
SSD) startups can get the jump on large, slow manufacturers" has now
ended.
Craig questions how startups like
Pure and
Tegile can expect to
compete now that "titans of the industry" such as NetApp, and EMC
(and by implication IBM, Dell, and HP too) have got their flash toys,
acquired, oemed,
licensed and integrated neatly within vast product catalogs?
Editor's
comments:- If you agree with Craig's premise - that all the disruptive
innovation is now over - then you'd probably also agree that it's not worth
taking risks with new enterprise SSD startups. Just stick with the big safe
vendors and you'll be OK.
You won't be surprised to learn I disagree.
This is what I said to Craig (by email) yesterday...
"Hi
Craig,
I saw your blog - Demise of the Flash startups - and might comment /
post about it. Liked the middle but disagree about the conclusion.
I would agree - if the pace of disruptive change in enterprise SSD
architecture had slowed down and if it already did solve most problems.
"But
with a lot of very big
changes in utilization still to come - the potential market size for
genuinely innovative enterprise SSD startups (drives, systems and software) is
bigger than it was before.
"So there will more startup
companies to acquire, license from and compete with. No one's got a whole
stable solution architecture and credible roadmap yet. At best current flash
systems are stepping stones to somewhere else."
Oh - and if you're
wondering - which is the part of Craig's blog I liked the most (apart from the
cleverly provocative title) it was where he says "...those SSDs aren't as
expensive as they
used to be." ...read
Craig's article | | |
. |
|
... |
|
| |