click to visit StorageSearch.com home page
leading the way to the new storage frontier .....
pcie SSDs - click to read article
PCI Express SSDs ..
image shows megabyte waving the winners trophy - there are over 200 SSD oems - which ones matter? - click to read article
top 20 SSD companies ..
the SSD Buyers Guide - click to see article
SSD buyers guide ..
click to read article - sugaring MLC for the enterprise
adding "e" to MLC ....
click to read the article - Big versus Small SSD architectures
Size in SSD architecture ..
read the article on SSD ASAPs
auto tiering SSDs ..
image shows software factory - click to see storage software directory
SSD software ....
.....

SSDs
Fusion-io's Octal - click for more info
ioDrive Octal
Fusion-io fast SSDs - click for more info
ioDrive product family
See also:-




next SSD....................		 the Fastest SSDs
SSD Controllers and IP
high availability enterprise SSDs
the 3 fastest PCIe SSDs list - or is it really lists?
don't all PCIe SSDs look pretty much the same?
if Fusion-io sells more SSDs does that mean Violin will sell less?
Legacy versus New Dynasty? - another new way of looking at the Enterprise SSD market
Editor:- February 1, 2012 - Scroll down to see my SSD architecture notes which will help you understand why this product from Fusion-io is different to others - and help you decide whether those are differences which matter to you.
manufacturer model the raw specs descriptions (scroll down to read the underlying story)
Fusion-io ioDrive Duo The ioDrive is a 2nd generation PCI-Express-based SSD with 320GB - 1.2TB capacity. Performance has been enhanced too. The ioDrive Duo can easily sustain 1.5 Gbytes/sec of read bandwidth and approximately 260,000 IOPS (SLC version). more info
Fusion-io ioDrive 2 The ioDrive 2 is a PCI-Express-based SSD with upto 600GB (SLC) / 1.2TB (MLC) of low latency storage (15µs write, and 47µs / 68µs read) and over 500,000 write IOPS. Designed for enterprise speedup - this family is designed for high reliability - and includes self-healing, wear management, and predictive monitoring OS support includes:- 64-Bit Microsoft XP/Vista/Win7/Server 2003/Server 2008, RHEL 4/5/6, SLES 10/11, OEL v5/6, VMware ESX 4.0/4.1/ESXi 4.1/5.0*, Solaris 10 U8/U9, OSX* 10.6.7/10.7, HP-UX* 11i more info
Editor:- November 15, 2011 - Fusion-io announced that it will ship 10TB versions of its ioDrive Octal (so-called because it includes 8 memory modules on double-wide PCIe cards) in the next quarter - which deliver 1.3 million IOPS with 6.7 GB/s bandwidth.
Editor's comments about Fusion-io's ioDrive and ioMemory - December 2011

Why would you want to install an SSD accelerator? - The obvious answer is - to make your storage and applications run faster. But if you have a preference - which should it be? - Speeding up the storage most? - or - Speeding up the app most?

This is a case of where the raw numbers - without the narrative - fail to tell the full story. (You can see indicative performance numbers extracted from Fusion-io's datasheets above - and if you need more numbers - the links will take you there.)

Fusion-io's SSDs are unique in today's enterprise flash accelerator market in that they don't include a microprocessor on-board the SSD card to implement the functions of the SSD controller. Doing the flash management isn't as big a load as you might suppose for the ioDrive host - because it's still less than the traditional packeting and handshaking workload of talking to legacy storage interfaces. In other respects FIO's SSDs fit into in my classified groupings of SSD architecture types as follows:-
  • ioDrives are - skinny (RAM cache flash) and
What are the consequences of the "host" CPU also being the flash controller?

This was a bold move by the fledgling company when it started. Throughout all past SSD history - the designers of SSDs had gone to great lengths to hide their memory handling intellectual property inside chips like FPGAs and ASICs. One business result of this was that in the early days Fusion-io had to be careful about picking its customers - so they made sure they chose big name reputable companies - whether they were end users (like Facebook) or server oems (like HP etc) - who would not reverse engineer the algorithms - or if they did - would be worth suing. Of course nowadays Fusion-io is a big enough company itself that it has volume based cost and brand advantages - so even if another company were to copy some of their SSD technology - why would anyone buy it. But when Fusion-io's founders started down this track it was a very risky move - so why do it?

The consequences of this architectural decison are:-
  • less hardware in the SSD card - so much better intrinsic MTBF and potentially the lowest cost to build product
  • faster access to flash data by wrap around software APIs
  • greater stickiness with customers - once customers start seeing the benefits from leveraging the features - competing products with bland raw speed don't look so attractive
  • speed of the SSD family is predictably scalable over future product generations.

    That's important for customers who don't want the risk of being locked into a design which looks fast this year - but might not be able to keep up with future CPU advances. If you look at the philosophy of the Fusion-io designs - one view you can take is that the SSD makes the host CPU work faster - because it speeds up access to the data. Another view - equally valid - is that because the host CPU is doing work for the flash memory - the faster the user's CPU - the faster the SSD.

    A practical consequence for server oems is this. If they have a bunch of ioDrives in stock and they put a faster CPU in their new server - some of that speedup also makes the ioDrives work a bit faster too - in a way which is different to products which use on-board microprocessors. And unlike SSD companies which use microprocessors - as long as host CPUs get faster and flash gets faster - then it's easy to predict that future ioDrives can be faster too.
Going back to my question at the start of this piece. Because ioDrive's don't have on-board offload processors - in a benchmark which simply looks at raw storage performance - ioDrive's (which are very fast) don't always look the fastest. Because it's possible to select benchmarks in which the offload plays a bigger part - so other competing SSDs will sometimes look faster.

But if you look an application speed - and if the app uses Fusion-io's APIs - which they call VSL - you see a different story.

Suppose your software does a lot of twiddly bits very fast and very often. No matter how fast or clever the offload processor is on another type of PCIe SSD card - there is still a level of inefficiency that comes in - because your software is talking to other software which has to go and look at the flash somewhere else. But in the ioDrive - the APIs are inside the flash controller loop. You can access (cleaned up and endurance managed) data almost at the same efficiency as you could if you had designed the SSD yourself for this particular app.

That's why with the ioMemory architecture the application can speed up at a faster rate than you might think by simply looking at comparative raw storage benchmarks. But you only have this level of control and software gain factor in a new installation - or a new design of storage appliance. That's something I discussed in my article Legacy vs New Dynasty a new way of looking at enterprise SSDs. You can probably guess - that Fusion-io is New Dynasty - and that's a description they liked when they read my article. (And their competitors on the Legacy side of the fence liked their own appellation too.)

If you're already in a distressed environment with servers overloaded and legacy apps which are running slow - adding an SSD accelerator may help - but the advantages and disadvantages of the ioMemory compared to alternative products are difficult or impossible to predict. I always say in that situation - it's best to try before you buy. Cautious minded users may even think about looking at much higher-cost add-on rackmount SSDs in those distressed situations - to avoid the risk of doing bad things to their already suffering old servers.

Another thing to think about in the legacy scenario is that - simply adding a fast SSD to a server running heavy duty apps isn't guaranteed to speed up your app.

That's something I learned in 1990 - when I had a customer with an Oracle app I wanted to speed up with an SSD. (The data set wasn't I/O bound - it was already small enough to be sitting entirely in main memory.)

More recently an architect from a leading software company told me he was surprised to discover that their core software didn't speed up as much as he expected when they evaluated the impact of ioDrive PCIe SSDs. When he analyzed the cause - it lay in their own source code and data architecture. Their software had been written for hard disk arrays and had inbuilt assumptions which meant they weren't running enough parallel threads to take advantage of the greater bandwidth and lower latency of SSDs. They would have got the same result with any other brand of PCIe SSD - but it made him realize that there was a lot more to being ready for the solid state storage future. Of course when they rewrote that software it ran faster.

Getting to success in the SSD market is complicated. I see my job here at the mouse site as trying to understanding all this complex stuff to help the SSD industry get better, faster. I hope you've found this helped you too. It's just one of thousands of SSD related peices I've written in the past 20 years. You can see the top 66 most popular SSD articles here.

editor's footnotes

I've spoken to the founders of Fusion-io many times in the past 4 years and also to systems integrators and ISVs who have used these products. I also talk to all their main SSD competitors too to learn how competing products and businesses work. My notes above are designed to help you quickly understand why this product from Fusion-io is different - and whether those are differences which matter to you.

Later

I noticed that Fusion-io has written a white paper re the Fusion-io Difference (SSD Differentiator). It has a different perspective - but has nice pictures. For some of you that may be worth seeing too.

SSD ad - click for more info

storage search banner

1.0" SSDs 1.8" SSDs 2.5" SSDs 3.5" SSDs rackmount SSDs PCIe SSDs SATA SSDs
SSDs all flash SSDs hybrid drives flash memory RAM SSDs SAS SSDs Fibre-Channel SSDs

StorageSearch.com is published by ACSL