"Greasing the dataflow through
legacy hard disk arrays" - by
(this article was published here in
The number of vendors
category will rise to hundreds in
the next 3 years as enterprise users become more familiar with the benefits of
this type of storage.
Market entry costs are low...
It's easy for
RAID systems oems to
requalify their products to use SSDs. But unlike the transition to
NAS which we chronicled in
the late 1990s (where low performance products found valid application niches if
they were cheap enough) the role of the SSD array today is primarily server
That means not all
hard disk boxes will be
optimal for use with SSDs. Slow bus interface adapters and slow
RAID controllers will
eat into the latency budget and squander potential SSD performance. I have no
doubt that in addition to many worthy products - some abysmal SSD arrays
will also come to market (populated by no / low performance SSDs) as floods
of lemming like companies leap into the enterprise SSD surf.
at future trends - the rackmount SSD market can be grouped in 4 main segments
some element of open architecture RAM SSDs - like those from
Technologies, Third I/O
and (later) Kaminario
- in which industry standard servers are used as the platform to build the SSD
(using proprietary software).
think that all 4 product types will survive in the market for several years.
advantage of proprietary SSD rackmounts is they offer superior
performance compared to COTS arrays of flash / RAM SSDs.
applications which need the ultimate performance - which can only be met by
proprietary architecture SSDs - there can also be applications in which the
proprietary products offer superior price / performance or reliability compared
to "open SSDs" - due to what I call - "big SSD
For example - some proprietary SSD rackmounts
use significantly less memory chips and electrical power to deliver a usable
SSD capacity and resilience (compared to open systems) - due to the fact that
they have been optimally designed as a rackmount solution. (In many open SSD
arrays there is duplication of effort and wastage of performance due to
optimization at the module level followed by another level on optimization at
the array of modules level.)
The advantage of open SSD rackmounts
is they appeal to users who want to reduce the risks of buying from new
vendors - and who don't want to get locked into proprietary systems.
The argument goes something like this..
Even if the original
supplier of the proprietary
2.5" SSDs (used in
the open array) exits the market - there are another 30 or so manufacturers of
similar SSDs who can fill the unused / future disk slots at similar cost.
approach is likely to appeal to conservative buyers - and may carry more
weight than arguments about superior performance. Many customers will get "adequate"
performance from these "safe, dull and open" SSD architectures.
And even if they cost more today (than the proprietary SSD systems) - there's a
realistic expectation that in future they will cost less (or get faster) due to
competition in the SSD component / module market.
As you can see - the
rackmount SSD market is far from simple. And there will be no such thing as a
clear and present leader or winner which will satisfy all customers,
applications or budgets until another 2-3 SSD product generations have been
tested in the market. So it could remain a confusing picture till 2013.
Users now realize that in
their own self interest they have much to gain from abstracting the benefits
they get away from the diverse feature sets of any single supplier towards a
minimalist set of common must-have features.
Skyera is putting a lot of
effort into joining something which looks a lot like an old fashioned English
gentleman's club (think- Forsyte Saga or Sherlock Holmes). But we know that the
current members of the club are so old they will die soon anyway. So is it worth