the SSD Buyers Guide - click to see article
SSD buyers guide
the fastest SSDs - click to read article
the fastest SSDs
the problem with flash SSD  write IOPS
the problem with
write IOPS in FSSDs

storagesearch.com

storage search
11 years - "leading the way to the new storage frontier"

ssd ad - click for more info

Why I Tire of "Tier Zero Storage"......................

Debunking Tier 0 Storage Babble

May 18, 2009 - by Zsolt Kerekes, editor StorageSearch.com

"Tier 0" is not a term I've ever knowingly used in editorial - which you may find strange for a storage publication which talks so much about SSDs.

It's not that I'm unaware of its existence. I just resist any jargon term which contributes no useful new concepts or (as is the case with tier 0) is completely misleading and doesn't tell you anything you didn't already know.

Don't get me wrong. I've got nothing against recognizing that traditional storage hierarchies need to add new levels.

I remember telling a bunch of bunch of HSM vendors back in 1999 that their pretty little pyramid shaped diagrams seemed to lacking a level or 2 for SSDs.

"What's an SSD?" I was asked. OK that was 10 years ago, and they might have had an excuse for not knowing back then. The HSM companies didn't exactly set the world on fire because they were mainly backwards looking. They knew how to tell the difference between a tape drive, optical jukebox and hard disk and if you bought their software - the supplier had gone bust or acquired before you installed version 2.0. HSM stopped being a sexy term in press releases round about the same time that NAS came into vogue.

You may be surprised that as recently as a few months ago (in 2009) I was amazed by a storage vendor who was so proud of the ability of their software to help you manage the difference between 7,200 RPM and 15,000 RPM storage arrays. I asked what it could do about 300,000 RPM equivalent storage - like SSDs? "It can't do those" - I was told. I won't name the company here - because I'm not trying to embarrass anyone.

Sometimes I'll adopt a new jargon term the very 1st time I see it. A recent example of that was "write amplification".

On a slow news day I'll poke fun at companies who try to twist and chisel perfectly good words (which are understood by nearly everyone) into newer varieties, with a slight nuance of meaning. There's a list of examples on the RAID systems page if you're interested.

Green storage? - Hmpf.

Mostly when a new phrase comes along - I'll wait and see how many other companies adopt it before running with it in a big way.

So why have I resisted the term "tier 0 storage" for so many years?

What have I got against it?

My answer comes in 2 parts....

1 - What's wrong with "SSD"? - A simple word which is starting to become better understood - and is in fact the #1 search term which brings readers to this site. (OK we know that SSD is preloaded with many cultural values and assumptions - depending on who uses the word. And we also know that not all SSDs are created equal. That's a topic of many articles.)

2 - Tier 0 is misleading. It gives you a simplistic and unrealistic view of the storage acceleration concept.

Suppose you plug in a PCIe flash SSD card to a server. I think most tier 0 fans would agree that's a good example of what their beloved term is about. (Other variations can also include SSDs with other interfaces installed inside or close to the server box.) So far - so good. The result - in a well designed system - is a server which can run some applications faster than the same server using rotating storage. That's the principle I call SSD CPU equivalence. It's not a new concept BTW. Just a newish phrase for something I discovered in systems I was integrating 20 years ago - and was known to many others - long before then.

At this point.... We've successfully used an SSD and the term "tier 0" in a context which seems clear and unambiguous.

Now it will get complicated... What happens when you have 100 or so of these "tier 0" inside servers operating in an application where they have to share or exchange some critical data?

A new bottleneck creeps in - on the SAN. (I'll call it the SAN to keep it simple - but actually the storage interconnect between the 100 or so servers could be Ethernet, InfiniBand or whatever.)

As we know from hundreds of published (and more unpublished) case studies the fix to this type of problem is to attach a faster SSD (typically a RAM SSD) to unblock the dataflow logjams across the storage network.

So now we have a new box - the dataflow logjam unblocker - which may internally have a latency and bandwidth 10x or 100x faster than the SSDs - which we earlier called "Tier 0 storage".

What are we going to call the new SAN SSD? - Derrr... "Tier minus one?" or "Tier a bigger number?"

You can see my quarrel with "Tier 0". It assumes a very simple architectural model. And extrapolating from the term takes you nowhere useful from a semantic or technical point of view. It really doesn't tell you anything that you didn't already know before.

In real life you can have multiple levels of SSD at the DAS level - inside the server box - and externally too. It's going to be hard enough learning about all the many flavors of SSD. So let's not waste any of our precious brain cells by investing "tier 0 storage" with an importance it doesn't deserve.
...
solid state disks - home page for SSDs since 1998
SSDs
on StorageSearch.com
Over 150 SSD manufacturers listed
and profiled on our classic SSD page.
.
click for more info about the revolutionary auto tuning XcelaSAN SSD accelerator from Dataram
XcelaSAN is a "revolutionary" self optimizing
2U enterprise SSD accelerator
from Dataram
.
the Problem with Write IOPS
Editor:- December 16, 2009 - StorageSearch.com today published a new article - the Problem with Write IOPS - in flash SSDs.

Flash SSD "random write IOPS" are now similar to "read IOPS" in many of the fastest SSDs. So why are they such a poor predictor of application performance?

And why are users still buying RAM SSDs which cost 9x more than SLC? - even when the IOPS specs look similar.
the problem with flash SSD  write IOPS This new article tells you why the specs got faster - but the applications didn't. And why competing SSDs with apparently identical benchmark results can perform completely differently. ...read the article
.
SSD news
SSD Bookmarks
the Fastest SSDs
the SSD Buyers Guide
SSD Jargon Explained
After SSDs... What Next?
Flash SSDs / RAM SSDs
What's a Solid State Disk?
the Top 10 SSD Companies
Increasing Flash SSD Reliability
Why I Tire of "Tier Zero Storage"
Data Recovery from Flash SSDs?
How Solid is Hard Disk's Future?
Can you trust your flash SSD specs?
Is the SSD Market Recession-Proof?
3 Easy Ways to Enter the SSD Market
Looking Ahead to the 2009 SSD Market
30 Years of SSDs - SSD Market History
Why Seagate will Fail the SSD Challenge
the 10 biggest storage companies in 2012?
Are MLC SSDs Safe in Enterprise Apps?
SSD Myths and Legends - "write endurance"
RAM SSDs versus Flash SSDs - which is Best?
Flash Memory vs. Hard Disks - Which Will Win?
Using SSDs to Boost Legacy RAID Performance
3.5" Terabyte SSDs with Gigabyte / S Performance
Hybrid Storage Drives - winners, losers and maybes
Flash vs DRAM Price Projections - for SSD Buyers
War of the Disks: Hard Disk Drives vs. Flash SSDs
SSDs Pushing the Envelope in Blade Server Design
How Bad is - Choosing the Wrong SSD Supplier?
Z's Laws - Predicting Future Flash SSD Performance
Calling for an End to Unrealistic SSD vs HDD IOPS Comparisons
the Most Popular Products on StorageSearch.com - (2007 to 2009)
.

storage search banner

1.0" SSDs 1.8" SSDs 2.5" SSDs 3.5" SSDs rackmount SSDs PCIe SSDs SATA SSDs
SSDs all flash SSDs hybrid drives flash memory RAM SSDs SAS SSDs Fibre-Channel SSDs

STORAGEsearch is published by ACSL