click to visit StorageSearch.com home page
leading the way to the new storage frontier .....
image shows software factory - click to see storage software directory
SSD software ....
SSD SoCs controllers
SSD controllers ..
pcie  SSDs - click to read article
PCIe SSDs ..
click to see directory of SAS SSD companies .
SAS SSDs
image shows megabyte waving the winners trophy - there are over 200 SSD oems - which ones matter? - click to read article
top SSD oems ..
.....

what's the role for a Radian Memory SSD?

would I be right in thinking this...?

No. Turns out I was wrong. But I'm glad I asked.

by Zsolt Kerekes, editor - StorageSearch.com - November 10, 2015
As long suffering readers know I try to think of conceptual shortcuts to help place SSDs and related technical concepts into mental buckets - sorted by simple design and architectural features - which enable them to be placed in groups for later detailed scrutiny.

Past examples of such technical filters include:- So a few months ago when I was thinking about Radian's RMS-250 (a 2.5" NVMe PCIe SSD) it looked sufficiently out of place (compared to others in this form factor) that I made a tentative decision to categorize it in a particular way.

As this categorization would have far reaching effects (on my own future time budget allocated to writing about the company, and the way that readers would think about the product - if they adopted my cookie cutter) I thought I should check my assumptions with the company first.

And I'm glad I did. Because not only was my initial guess wrong - but other things which I gleaned from this dialog (related to SSD and storage ancient history) enabled me to link up some previously unconnected strands of market stories which I had written about or read about decades before.

To save me time - and to give you more detail - the rest of this article is cut and paste from some emails between myself (that's the Zsolt part) and Mike Jadon, CEO of Radian who recalled that we had spoken "about a dozen years earlier (ouch!)" relative to his former company (Micro Memory) and the PCI NVRAM line that they sold into storage OEMs.


Zsolt said - Would I be right in describing Radian's SSD as the kind of product which a designer might think of having just one of? - as an accelerator in an appliance rather than having large numbers of them in an array?

2 things point in that direction

1 the power consumption (25W) due to the memory place it at the upper end of the 2.5 NVMe SSD range. And I know from talking to designers of arrays which have high SSD counts they like the power controllable envelopes which are seen in array-friendly designs.

2 the multi-level software scalability. Does that scale effectively when the SSD target is 4x, 8x and maybe 30x SSDs If I can get clarification on that it will help me orient the appropriate positioning of the product for the right kind of application considerations.


Mike answered each of these questions as follows.


re - Zsolt said - Would I be right in describing Radians SSD as the kind of product which a designer might think of having just one of as an accelerator in an appliance rather than having large numbers of them in an array?

Mike said - Very much the opposite. Our team comes from Micro Memory (supplier of devices into Storage OEMs), and from Storage array OEMs like EMC/Isilon, Dot Hill, and Data Direct.

From the outset, the product architecture was first designed to target arrays, and then we branched out to targeting server-side applications.

Specifically, targeting arrays was an impetus for our 'offload engine' architecture.

We are not a FTL at all, but any host based FTL tends to consume lots of host resources and bottlenecks on host resources as devices are added to a system.

Alternatively, treating the SSD as an offload engine enables us to scale all of our perf. numbers (IOPS, bandwidth, latency, QoS), but more importantly CPU/I-O utilization, as additional SSDs are added to a system.

This concept has also fit well in server-side applications, particularly hyperconverged, as it provides the maximum potential performance but does so at the lowest utilization of host resources, making those host resources available for resident applications.

re Zsolt's questions about power consumption?

Mike said - We can also run the device lower than 25W, but our performance numbers have been bench marked at max power utilization, hence we state 25W for consistency.

Our bigger problem with supporting arrays today is that most are still SAS/SATA based as the 2.5" NVMe ecosystem is still developing. Many of the array companies, in particular the purpose-built AFA companies, are moving to all NVMe arrays but the releases are more in the Q3 '16 time frame.

re Zsolt's question - the multi-level software scalability. Does that scale effectively when the SSD target is 4x, 8x and maybe 30x SSDs?

Mike said - Due to PCIe hardware platform limitations, we've only been able to benchmark 7 SSDs on a single CPU?, and every metric scaled linearly. But in theory our metrics should scale linearly to >20 SSDs.


Editor's footnotes.

The timing of these emails was around the date of a SNIA conference presentation in which Radian talked on the theme of Integrating Cooperative Flash Management with SMR (Shingled Magnetic Recording) Technology for Optimized Tiering in Hybrid Systems (pdf).

I didn't write about that presentation at the time - but the use of Radian's SSD in a hybrid appliance is another thing which had led me to the wrong assumption that it was a "one in a box" kind of product.

Mike had some interesting comments on that (in the same emails) which touch on Radian's views about the market direction. So I've pasted them here.

Mike said - The announcement regarding SMR, the associated zbc standard, and its alignment with our CFM (Cooperative Flash Management) technology is likely bigger than it may first appear. SMR is going to take over cloud HDD storage, and then make a significant impact into enterprise.

There's striking similarities between SMR and NAND, and CFM exploits those similarities very well so *systems* can now be optimized for both HDD and Flash.

Thinking about it from a different perspective, for the last five years systems have been transitioning optimizations from HDD to Flash... improving kernel schedulers, discarding legacy elevator algorithms, and the introduction of the NVMe command set.

Continuing this evolution of cleaning up inefficient legacy abstractions has to address the FTL - the elephant in the room with regards abstractions, and one no longer necessary for many host systems. Given the requirements for SMR, one of the main rationales for FTLs, which is to emulate hard drives, is becoming an obsolete requirement.

Future systems can, for the first time, simultaneously be optimized for both HDD and NAND media.


Editor's note - that's it. I hope you found it interesting.
...
SSD news
the Top SSD Companies
what's the state of DWPD?
how fast can your SSD run backwards?
what's so very different about the design of Fusion-io's ioDrives / PCIe SSDs?
...

storage search banner

StorageSearch.com is published by ACSL


Megabyte image
I think I know what's coming next
..
SSD news

SSD jargon

2.5" PCIe SSDs

the SSD Bookmarks

2015 - the SSD year (so far)

market research - all data storage

How will the HDD market fare... in an SSD world?

Meet Ken - and the enterprise software SSD event horizon

Enterprise SSD's future? - the upwards rush to fewer companies









.
SSD ad - click for more info









.
The SSD market has managed to accrue an imaginative body of literature which includes truths, half truths, mysticism, misunderstandings. myths, legends - and in some cases - downright balderdash - when it comes to the subject of SSD costs, pricing and justifications.

Now we're seeing new trends in pricing flash arrays which don't even pretend that you can analyze and predict the benefits using technical models.
Exiting the Astrological Age of Enterprise SSD Pricing









.
SSD ad - click for more info








.
"...Application-unaware design of memory controllers, and in particular memory scheduling algorithms, leads to uncontrolled interference of applications in the memory system"
Are you ready to rethink RAM?








.

Radian's CFM was among technologies mentioned in StorageSearch.com's year end retrospective article - the 3 big ideas in 2015










.
SSD ad - click for more info