SSDs over 163  current & past oems profiled
SSD news
hard disk drives articles and directory
HDD news ..
HDDs vs flash SSDs - classic article on StorageSearch.com
war of the disks ..

StorageSearch.com

enterprise buyers guides since 1991

storage search
"leading the way to the new storage frontier"

How Much Hay Has Your Car Been Eating Lately? - by Zsolt Kerekes, editor

Calling for an End to Unrealistic SSD vs HDD IOPS Comparisons

I think I'm safe in assuming that the last time you bought a car - you didn't compare its speed or fuel consumption to a horse. Am I right? Of course you didn't. You compared it to other cars!
click for more info
Editor:- I've been publishing articles about the SSD market for over a decade - so maybe that's why something in my brain snapped yesterday (May 28, 2008) - when I was reading yet another new article from an SSD vendor about the server acceleration which you could get from their product.

Because the only competition it mentioned was hard drives.

Enough is enough! - I said.

I can't remember whether the article claimed their product was 300x or 500x faster in random IOPS than a 15K SAS hard drive - but as the IOPS in a hard drive haven't changed much since the appearance of the first 15K RPM products in EMC's CLARiiON systems in 2002, and as there may never be a 20K RPM drive... The long and the short of it is that every month the fastest SSDs get better - while the fastest hard drives remain exactly as fast as they were. So the HDD versus SSD random IOPS gap gets wider. We haven't learned anything new!

I'm not denying that these comparisons have been useful in the past. And they are still useful when a single 2.5" SSD for example is being compared with a single 2.5" hard drive. But as I wrote in an article in 2003 when you're looking at what a fast rackmount SSD can do for you - you should be calculating how many servers you can save / or would need to add to get to the same 3x application speedup - not how many disks.

It's understandable that people refer new products to an assumed common frame of reference.

I'm sure that a century ago when the first car owners were talking to their neighbors - they must have made comparisons like - how much faster they were than a horse.

"It's amazing. Unlike my old horse my new car doesn't get tired. And I don't need pasture or hay to make it go - just a few bottles of gas."

And you didn't get the same stinking mess in the city streets either. (At the time the Sherlock Holmes stories were being published in the Strand Magazine in 1892 - there was a "green" market carting horse dung out of London to stop the streets becoming impassable.)

I think I'm safe in assuming that the last time you bought a car - you didn't compare its speed or fuel consumption to a horse. Am I right?

Of course you didn't. You compared it to other cars!

It's a sign of a maturing market when there are enough products around to compare them to each other, instead of comparing them to what came before. And we have reached that time with SSDs. It's taken 30 years - but that's another story.

This new wave of comparing SSDs to each other kicked off with the article RAM SSDs versus Flash SSDs - which is Best? - which included views from leading SSD oems on both sides of the fence. And other articles have demolished the myths about SLC flash SSDs while highlighting the risks of using MLC flash in inappropriate server applications.

In my view comparing SSDs to HDDs does not give you a useful picture when you're looking at options in the server acceleration market.
SSD articles Although I expect that such weak comparisons will be sprinkled in lite weight SSD articles for the next few years - it's time for some stronger seasoning. It's time for more articles by SSD vendors to say how their products and technologies compare with other SSDs.

...Later:- some companies are still doing it... ..In contrast - here's a fact filled vendor-neutral white paper (published November 2008) - which provides useful measurements and comparisons...
the problem with flash SSD  write IOPS
the Problem with Write IOPS - in flash SSDs
Repeating write operations in some apps
and some flash SSDs can take orders of
magnitude longer than predicted by IOPS
benchmarks and latency specs.

Time goes by - in the "play it again Sam"
scene intrinsic to databases - discrediting
long established performance modeling metrics.
click to see more info about SSDs from Kingfast
1.8", 2.5" & 3.5" flash SSDs
for consumer, industrial, enterprise & rugged apps
from KingFast
We have hundreds of SSD articles on StorageSearch.com
Here, below, are some examples.
  • SSD Market History - lists product and technology milestones in the 30 years of the SSD market upto the end of 2009.
  • RAM Cache Ratios in flash SSDs - it's important to know the underlying RAM cache architecture - even if you're happy with the R/W and IOPS performance.
  • 2010 - 1st Fizz in the SSD Bubble? - even the dogs in the street know this is going to be a multibillion dollar market. Greed will play as big a part as technology in shaping the SSD year ahead.
  • the pros and cons of using SSD ASAPs - auto tuning SSD appliances are a new category of SSD which entered the market in the 2nd half of 2009 to accelerate servers without needing human tune-ups. How can you tell if they are right for you? And how well do they work?
.........................................................................................

storage search banner

STORAGEsearch storage manufacturers the Fastest SSDs Squeak! - the Solid State Disks Buyers Guide Military STORAGE Solid state disks
STORAGEsearch is published by ACSL