SSD controllers
define the personality of an
SSD.
Before 2007 - it was rare for SSD makers to say much about what
their internal controllers did - or how they did it.
After 2007
- which I called "the Year of SSD
Revolutions" - the critical role of the once shadowy SSD controller
became clearer to a wider market in these important respects:-
- some flash SSDs were an order of magnitude faster and more reliable than
others
- customers cared about the differences and were prepared to pay to get them
- the center of gravity in
SSD market pricing
had moved away from the memory components and towards the controller
The
functions performed by a flash SSD controller are the most complex operations
performed by any hardware in the computer market. |
|
|
| ..................................................................................................................................................... |
.......... |
|
| SandForce
awareness timeline - from stealth mode to "SandForce Driven SSDs" |
| (for contemporary comments and
analysis follow the links to the archived content) |
In the 1st quarter of
2009
as the number of merchant SSD controller companies reached double digits and
StorageSearch.com prepared to publish a directory of SSD controllers and IP -
a new company still in stealth mode - called
SandForce -
was about to launch a new controller design that would shift the performance
boundaries for a 2.5"
flash SSD into the territory previously occupied by entry level
rackmount
RAM SSDs.
Before
SandForce - it was rare for SSD controller companies to be known or recognized
outside a very small technical community. But within a few months - the new
company became one of the best known SSD brands in the SSD industry.
March
2009 - SandForce - in stealth mode - supplied embargoed content to editors
and set up briefings.
April 2009 -
SandForce unveiled its SF-1000 family of SSD Processors - aimed at oems building
SATA flash SSDs.
July 2009 - SandForce made its 1st
appearance in the quarterly
Top 10 SSD companies
list - going straight in at #2. This was the 1st time that the list
included a company whose primary business was designing SSD controllers.
November
2009 - StorageSearch.com commented on the growing number of SSD oems
who were known to be using SandForce controllers - and started using the term
"SandForce inside" SSDs. |
|
|
| August 2010 - at the time of publishing
this article - 15 companies were listed on SandForce's co-branding web page.
But I doubt whether all companies who use these controllers will want to be
part of this program - for reasons discussed later in this article. |
| | |
|
| We have
hundreds
of SSD articles on StorageSearch.com |
Here are some more
examples.
- SSD
Market History - lists product and technology milestones in the 30 years of
the SSD market upto the end of 2009.
- RAM Cache
Ratios in flash SSDs - it's important to know the underlying RAM cache
architecture - even if you're happy with the R/W and IOPS performance.
- 2010 - 1st Fizz
in the SSD Bubble? - even the dogs in the street know this is going to be a
multibillion dollar market. Greed will play as big a part as technology in
shaping the
SSD year ahead.
- Reaching for the
petabyte SSD - looks into the far distant future and proposes that the
way we think about storage will change - from being a cost overhead (today) to
being a profit center. More (storage) will be better - if enterprises can
leverage their data (and automatically grow new data) with upcoming SSD and
search-engine enabled software technologies.
- the pros and cons of
using SSD ASAPs - auto tuning SSD appliances are a new category of SSD
which entered the market in the 2nd half of 2009 to accelerate servers without
needing human tune-ups. How can you tell if they are right for you? And how
well do they work?
- the Problem
with Write IOPS - in flash SSDs - long established as a useful performance
modeling metric - this article explains why some specs are exaggerated when
applied to flash SSDs - or predict the wrong results for many common
applications.
| | |
| . |
|
what do I think about SandForce's SSD
controller branding program?
I was the editor of the leading
publication in the SSD market - during this period - and from that perspective
SandForce's achievement of getting their company so well known, and so quickly
in competition with nearly 200 other SSD technology companies - looked very
impressive!
I had seen transient spikes in popularity before and I
didn't think it would last for more than a few quarters - but I was wrong.
In
the October 2009
edition of the Top 10 SSD companies list - I offered an interpretation of
SandForce's continuing ability to capture the interest of so many people in the
SSD market with this observation.
"SandForce's dual frenemmy
nature may be a factor in the high interest levels in this company. Even if
you're not planning to use their products - you can't afford to ignore them -
because their technology may pop up in another place close to your own
interests."
Leveraging this PR based visibility with a branding
program was an obvious and long anticipated next step. Before discussing that
in more detail let's look at earlier chip branding models from history.
comparisons
with other models of microprocessor branding
Intel Inside
There
are much fewer examples of chip co-branding programs in computer history than
you might expect - if your background is from other markets. That's because the
nature of this market is B2B rather than B2C - and there are many complicated
technical ecosystem considerations as well as strategic ones which are
associated with this kind of chip selection decision - which are outside the
comprehension of FMCG marketers.
Exceptionally - one of the world's
best known brands did come from a chip company and the Intel
Inside program. A key features of this advertising driven program was
that computer makers were offered incentives in the form of discounts on the
products they bought if they promoted the fact they were using Intel's x86
processors inside their computers (as opposed to x86 chips from other companies
which either had licensed the architecture - or had reverse engineered it - or
in some cases simply copied it).
SPARC compliant
Another
example (which is less well known outside enterprise computing circles) was
the SPARC program
set up by Sun Microsystems in 1989 (which
ran succesfuly till
about 1997 - after which its use declined as
Sun de-emphasized
the SPARC brand).
To manage the SPARC branding program Sun set
up a hands-off (but strongly dependent) branding ORG - called
SPARC International
- which certified products for technical compatibility and policed the naming
and licensing of sub-brands. A handful of chipmakers did in fact develop
competing SPARC chips - and about 200 member manufacturers helped to create a
SPARC systems market with an annual revenue peaking over $20 billion in 2000.
The business side of that worked in the following way. Members paid annual fees
- to display the SPARC compatible logo (the amount was related to the voting
strength of the company). In addition companies paid one-off fees to create and
license their own sub brands - such as
TurboSPARC for
example.
how is SandForce Driven SSDs different to earlier business
models for microprocessor ?
In preparing this article - I
contacted Kent Smith Senior Director, Product Marketing at SandForce to
ask if companies who use their logo are offered any monetary incentives to
participate in the program.
He said "At this time there is no
financial connection with participation in the program."
So
that's one important difference to the Intel Inside scheme. Other important
differences are:-
- You don't have to buy a controller from SandForce to make an SSD. But you
did have to use an x86 architecture processor to make an IBM / Microsoft
compatible PC - when Intel started their program.
Over 50 companies
currently design flash SSD controllers - of which about half offer their
controllers to 3rd parties. Although the number of SSD oems is currently under
200 - the big
picture is that this will grow to over 1,000 companies in a few years -
creating a huge market for successful controller IP suppliers. It's reasonable
to anticipate that the proportion of SSD oems who buy in their SSD controller IP
will transition to be the majority - instead of the minority (as it was in
2005).
- SandForce's early market recognition occurred despite zero
advertising spend - whereas Intel's branding program became a double digit
percentage of the company's overall business costs.
As an
SSD market analyst
- I don't think that zero ad spend is sustainably viable for any SSD company in
such a competitive market.
As a
publisher I naturally
hope - that if there is any advertising money behind this - I'd like to get
some. It's interesting to note that some actual advertisers of mine who I know
used SandForce chips - didn't mention that connection in the original versions
of their ads.
- Some SSD oems think they will lose credibility with their customers if they
admit they use IP from elsewhere. That includes
Seagate whose 1st SSD
product did include a SandForce controller - which they didn't want to talk
about - presumably because it was a tactical step to get into the SSD market -
whereas the strategic aspiration is to design its own in collaboration with
Samsung.
In
contrast - I cannot imagine that any computer manufacturer would ever have
thought they would lose credibility by admitting that their x86 compatible
computers used Intel chips.
...Later:- October 2010 - as Seagate has
done many times before on the subject of SSDs - the company changed its mind and
allowed itself to be listed in SandForce's list of oems who use its technology
- but without being part of the marketing program.
- Some SSD oems think that their SSDs will be devalued and appear "me-too"
if they talk too much about the SSD controller inside. That's because although
many complicated factors go into the
SSD price mix
it's fair to assume that the general level of
SSD education in
the market is too low to recognize the important specification subtleties
signaled by SSD jargon.
Future
of SandForce's branding program?
In technical markets like SSDs -
branding cannot be treated in isolation to technology.
But if you
already have great technology - then great marketing can get your product into
more customer short lists - and it can increase the profitability of your
technology assets.
SandForce's standing in the
SSD Top 10 lists in
the past 5 quarters shows that the market is very receptive to new ideas and
products emerging from this company.
As the
SSD market bubbles
on - more SSD companies will have to turn to marketing. But SandForce will
always be remembered as the 1st SSD controller company that most users could
name.
See also:-
SandForce
- editor mentions on StorageSearch.com
For real-time SSD market
developments - see SSD news.
author's footnotes:-
SandForce did not sponsor or
suggest I write this article. At the time of publishing SandForce was not an
advertiser on StorageSearch.com.
...Later:- December 9, 2010
- I'm pleased to say that - 4 months after publishing this artice - SandForce's
first online ads appeared in the SSD pages of StorageSearch.com. You can see the
ad page here. |
|
