click to visit StorageSearch.com home page
leading the way to the new storage frontier .....
cloud storage news, vendors, articles  and directory - click here
cloud storage ..
broken barrel image - click to see the SSD data recovery directory
SSD recovery ..
read the article on SSD ASAPs
auto tiering SSDs ..
tape library directory
tape libraries ..
image shows megabyte waving the winners trophy - there are over 200 SSD oems - which ones matter? - click to read article
top SSD companies ..
click here to see our directory of SSD market analysts
SSD market analysts ..

CNTUsing Remote Disk and Tape for Business Continuity/Disaster Recovery

by Patty Barkley, Storage Networking Market Manager, CNT - (February 2003)

storage news
Disk to disk backup
Virtual Tape: Can You Afford to Ignore It?
Compared to EMC... our all flash arrays are better
..
Editor's intro:- CNT has often appeared in news stories we've run about wide area internet storage. I asked CNT to tell our readers some of the things they can in real life applications with this new technology. This article is the result.
..
Using Remote Disk and Tape for Business Continuity/Disaster Recovery
Overview

Businesses today are increasingly aware that the dangers to their mission-critical data are greater than ever before. Government agencies and private disaster planners are urging businesses to establish BC/DR systems that separate primary and backup sites by at least 200 miles, instead of the typical 60 miles. The SEC and Federal Reserve are calling for businesses that play a significant role in financial markets to establish fully redundant backup sites at least 300 miles offsite and be able to recover critical activities on the same business day of a disaster.

Tape has long been an affordable backup medium. However, when it came to remote data replication, tape had severe limitations. With heavy latency impact over as little as a 10-mile distances, remote tape backup was not a viable option for BC/DR planning - until the introduction of tape pipelining.

Tape pipelining virtually eliminates the impact of latency on the sustainable throughput of tape backup over distance. With tape pipelining, the remote tape backup system appears local to the server and is able to sustain high performance over thousands of miles. This greatly enhanced performance over distance allows considerable flexibility to companies considering tape as part of their BC/DR strategy. Tape pipelining can enable a single central site to act as a backup facility for many geographically dispersed data centers. It can also enable backup from a central site to a remote site.

Companies can backup stored tape data across low-cost and readily available IP connections, using both newer native Fibre Channel tape drives as well as older SCSI drives. In addition, open systems servers such as UNIX and NT can be incorporated into remote tape strategies.

Many companies are using IP networks for remote disk mirroring which is typically synchronous and therefore uses substantial network bandwidth during the day. Since tape backup is typically asynchronous and often done during nights and weekends, tape pipelining means that businesses can now use their existing IP networks for both disk mirroring and remote tape backup solutions.

The result is improved data protection and recoverability in the event of a disaster and a significant reduction in the total cost of ownership of a remote BC/DR solution.
Selecting BC/DR Solutions

In planning Business Continuity/Disaster Recovery systems, businesses can select from a wide range of data protection solutions. The choices they make will be determined by the importance of the information they need to protect (i.e. its time sensitivity and business value) and the amount of money they are willing to spend to protect it. These factors help determine appropriate the recovery time objective (RTO).

Industry research shows that a typical mid-sized to large enterprise might have 150 mission- and time-critical applications that require continuous availability; 300 or so applications that require data restoration within 4 to 24 hours; and 100 or so non-critical applications that can wait as long as several weeks for data restoration.

Levels of information protection

If a business cannot continue profitable operations without its data, it usually implements a remote hot site that completely duplicates critical data and applications and makes them continuously available. The cost of such a solution is justified by the cost to the business of even a few minutes of down time. At the other end of the spectrum is business data that may not need to be restored for days, weeks or even longer after a data center disruption. In fact, some business data requires no restoration at all but simply needs to be protected for legal and archival purposes.

The most cost-effective enterprise-wide BC/DR plan will probably involve a mixture of disk and tape technologies, from the most expensive for data that needs to be continuously available to less expensive technologies for data of less time sensitivity and importance. Figure 1 shows what such a plan might involve.
Fig 1
Figure 1. BC/DR plans typically include a mixture of storage technologies
based on the business objective of each application.
Tape backup market

The evolution toward networked storage, the heightened awareness of Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery planning and the need to reduce costs and improve efficiencies throughout IT, is stimulating the market for cost-effective tape and enterprise backup solutions.

IDC (September 2001) sees the tape market moving from solutions targeting the high end of the data storage market to lower-cost solutions that add more capacity than standalone tape drives. Through 2003/2004, as data volumes increase 200%-300% per year, Meta Group (October 2001) projects that backup/restore windows will be reduced using intelligent storage, highly parallel tape solutions, and FC-based SANs.

Gartner Group states unequivocally (March 2001) that disk-based replication will not replace tape backup. Tape's low cost - it is about 10 to 60 times less expensive than disk storage - makes it a compelling economic argument for its inclusion in any high-availability storage infrastructure.

Tape backup and its historical limitations

Tape backup plays a big role in cost-effective BC/DR systems since it is significantly less expensive than disk-based replication and is perfectly appropriate for protecting many types of business information. However, historically there have been inherent performance problems with tape backup over distance that limited its role in BC/DR planning.

The primary reason for this limited role is the sequential nature of tape I/O operations, which makes tape backup highly sensitive to the latency that accompanies distance. Unlike disk-based operations in which blocks can be written in parallel, tape I/O for a single block must complete before the next block can be written. Figure 2 illustrates the typical tape performance falloff with distance for several popular tape products. As the chart makes plain, remote tape backup systems simply don't have the throughput to move large amounts of data over distances of more than a few miles.
Figure 2. Tape performance degrades drastically when distance is increased,
as seen here in a comparison of several leading tape products.
Tape pipelining removes distance limitations

With tape pipelining technology, tape backup can play a larger role in BC/DR plans, even at distances of thousands of miles or more.

What is tape pipelining?

Tape pipelining is a data-streaming technique for remote tape applications. It maximizes the efficient flow of data by using the concepts of buffering and error recovery, and extending these capabilities over remote distances via emulation.

How tape pipelining works

In tape pipelining, the server and tape controller can sit thousands of miles apart, but the two units believe they are sitting next to each other in the same data center. Both the server and the tape controller have an intermediate device such as a storage router nearby that emulates the distant server or tape controller.

The exchange of information between the server and tape controller is buffered, allowing write/confirm operations to take place in tandem using temporary memory. For error recovery purposes, operations (and associated data) in the queue are retained until a successful completion status has been received from the controller.

Tape pipelining over IP

Figure 3 (below) illustrates usage in a typical IP network. It shows the dramatically different demands on network bandwidth during the day, versus nights and weekends. Tape pipelining over IP allows businesses to perform remote tape backups during those periods when bandwidth is essentially free.

For example, using existing IP networks between geographically separated facilities, companies can support their daily production network and real-time synchronous data replication and disk mirroring applications by day, and perform scheduled, asynchronous tape backups during evenings and weekends, when excess bandwidth is available.

Studies show that up to 80 percent of the total costs for a remote replication solution over five years are network bandwidth costs. Re-using existing bandwidth rather than maintaining dedicated lines can dramatically lower overall cost of ownership.
Figure 3
Figure 3: Periods of low utilization are ideal for asynchronous disk or tape replication.
With tape pipelining over IP, the same IP infrastructure can be used for synchronous
disk mirroring by day and asynchronous tape backup at night when bandwidth is
underutilized.
Key benefits of Tape Pipelining over IP
  • Businesses can use existing storage resources and IP networks as part of their BC/DR solutions by having a central site act as the backup for a number of geographically dispersed facilities.
  • Businesses can streamline server backups into one remote tape backup system because open systems servers, such as UNIX and NT, can be incorporated into previously mainframe-only networks.
  • Businesses can reuse existing tape drives by incorporating both the newer native Fibre Channel tape drives as well as older SCSI drives into the remote tape backup system.
  • Businesses can reduce the number of people required by centrally managing tape backup/restore operations.
  • Businesses can use existing IP networks and bandwidth, particularly during evenings and weekends.
Remote tape backup - a key part of BC/DR planning

With support for tape pipelining over IP networks, companies can perform remote backups using readily available, less expensive IP networks. It also allows highly distributed organizations to centrally manage the backup operation for its distributed facilities, improving data availability of its distributed, mission critical data (Figure 4).

For many companies, analysts recommend that BC/DR plans provide disk backup (data replication or data mirroring) to secondary backup centers hundreds of miles from primary sites for critical information that needs to be continuously available.

Analysts also advise that other types of information be available within hours of a manmade or natural disaster. The most cost effective way to meet both needs is to use the same network infrastructure and remote facilities for both synchronous disk backup (for business information essential to continuous operations) and for asynchronous tape backup (for less time-critical but still important data).

Tape pipelining makes it possible by eliminating the latency effects that traditionally have accompanied tape backup over distance. Devices that make tape pipelining possible use buffering, emulation and advanced compression techniques to make local and remote controllers and servers act as if they were right next to each other.

This not only makes it easier for more businesses to use disk and tape together to provide maximum coverage for information based on business requirements and budgetary restrictions, it also allows businesses to take better advantage of their IP bandwidth.

With tape pipelining, remote tape backup/restore comes of age. For businesses seeking to improve their data availability while at the same time controlling costs by using existing hardware, software and network bandwidth, remote tape backup over IP makes perfect sense.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Businesses can now combine remote disk
and tape backup operations over a single IP network.

...CNT profile

storage search banner

Disk to disk backup
Disk to disk backup on
STORAGEsearch
"I'm impressed by your new hotSTOR
disk to disk backup" said Megabyte to
Cheaperbyte . "Does it make coffee too?"
..
SSD ad - click for more info
..
if your cloud leveraged service is down - it's your fault
Editor:- March 7, 2017 - "If your business leverages AWS, and you had an outage or degraded operation during the massive AWS outage last week, you can only blame yourself" - says Erez Ofer, Partner at 83North in his new blog - No Excuses. Among other things Erez Ofer says - "What is happening now after each cloud outage is a lot of learning by businesses on how to create systems that don't go down." ...read the article

See also:- SSD empowered cloud
..
1.0" SSDs
1.8" SSDs
2.5" SSDs
3.5" SSDs

1973 - 2017 - the SSD story

2013 - SSD market changes
2014 - SSD market changes
2015 - SSD market changes
2016 - SSD market changes

20K RPM HDDs - no-show

About the publisher - 1991 to 2017
Adaptive R/W flash IP + DSP ECC
Acquired SSD companies
Acquired storage companies
Advertising on StorageSearch.com
Analysts - SSD market
Analysts - storage market
Animal Brands in the storage market
Architecture - network storage
Articles - SSD
Auto tiering SSDs

Bad block management in flash SSDs
Benchmarks - SSD - can your trust them?
Big market picture of SSDs
Bookmarks from SSD leaders
Branding Strategies in the SSD market

Chips - storage interface
Chips - SSD on a chip & DOMs
Click rates - SSD banner ads
Cloud with SSDs inside
Consolidation trends in the enterprise flash market
Consumer SSDs
Controller chips for SSDs
Cost of SSDs

Data recovery for flash SSDs?
DIMM wars in the SSD market
Disk sanitizers
DWPD - examples from the market

Efficiency - comparing SSD designs
Encryption - impacts in notebook SSDs
Endurance - in flash SSDs
enterprise flash SSDs history
enterprise flash array market - segmentation
enterprise SSD story - plot complications
EOL SSDs - issues for buyers

FITs (failures in time) & SSDs
Fast purge / erase SSDs
Fastest SSDs
Flash Memory

Garbage Collection and other SSD jargon

Hard drives
High availability enterprise SSDs
History of data storage
History of disk to disk backup
History of the SPARC systems market
History of SSD market
Hold up capacitors in military SSDs
hybrid DIMMs
hybrid drives
hybrid storage arrays

Iceberg syndrome - SSD capacity you don't see
Imprinting the brain of the SSD
Industrial SSDs
Industry trade associations (ORGs)
InfiniBand
IOPS in flash SSDs

Jargon - flash SSD

Legacy vs New Dynasty - enterprise SSDs
Limericks about flash endurance

M.2 SSDs
Market research (all storage)
Marketing Views
Memory Channel SSDs
Mice and storage
Military storage

News
Notebook SSDs - timeline
PATA SSDs
PCIe SSDs
Petabyte SSD roadmap
Power loss - sudden in SSDs
Power, Speed and Strength in SSD brands
PR agencies - storage and SSD
Processors in SSD controllers

Rackmount SSDs
RAID systems (incl RAIC RAISE etc)
RAM cache ratios in flash SSDs
RAM memory chips
RAM SSDs
RAM SSDs versus Flash SSDs
Reliability - SSD / storage
RPM and hard drive spin speeds

SAS SSDs
SATA SSDs
SCSI SSDs - legacy parallel
Security
Services
Software
Symmetry in SSD design

Tape libraries

Test Equipment
Top 20 SSD companies
Training
Tuning SANs with SSDs

USB storage
User Value Propositions for SSDs

VC funds in storage
Videos - about SSDs


..
About the Author:

Patty Barkley
, storage networking market manager, joined CNT in December 1999 and has more than 16 years of professional experience in sales and marketing of storage networking solutions. She is responsible for marketing CNT's storage networking products, services and solutions to its global customers and business partners.


..
SSD ad - click for more info
STORAGEsearch is published by ACSL