|
|
|
|
|
|
War of the Disks: Hard Disk Drives vs. Flash SSDs - classic articleDespatches from the magneto / flash wars - by Wilson WeiSheng Wang and Joanne De Peralta at BiTMICRO |
![]() | |||||||
| |||||||||
| |||||||||
| |||||||||
| Editor's (original) intro:-
August 2005 - BiTMICRO is one of the
Top Solid State Disk
OEMs (source STORAGEsearch.com) and they have published
a
lot of articles to help customers understand the benefits of their products.
When I first saw the submission for this article I was pleased to see that it quoted extracts from and linked to several other articles that I myself had written or edited - so that gave me a warm glow. After years of analyzing this market SSD vendors and analysts are starting to see some clear patterns emerging. Although opinions still differ on some subjects, and vendors are prone to pitch their own solutions as best, this article is a useful synthesis of current industry thinking by one of the leading flash SSD module manufacturers. War of the Disks: Hard Disk Drives vs. Flash SSDs Much has been written about solid state disks (SSDs) becoming the next big thing in the IT industry. But as to whether or not we have enough knowledge of how it will revolutionize the industry is a different question. How much do we really know about SSDs? If we are to ask people on the streets, it wouldn't come as a surprise that they don't know much of what an SSD is. Even if they do know, most probably it would be limited to a USB pen drive, a CompactFlash or a Secure Digital card, which are more on the consumer side of the storage industry. Technically speaking, they are not wrong. Most web definitions describe an SSD as a high-performance plug-and-play storage device that contains no moving parts. Therefore, given that most of the aforementioned mobile disk storage devices contain no movable parts, they can certainly be categorized as SSDs. But then again, there's more to SSDs than being a non-volatile device. The purpose of this article is to give readers a clearer picture of what an SSD is, its usage as well as its difference when pitted against the predominant data storage device at present - the hard disk drive (HDD). More than its non-volatility, this article will reveal how much potential SSDs have in optimizing the performance of the computing system. SSD Defined
|
| |||||||||||||||||
|
From the webopedia SSD article
For the rest of this particular article, we will compare the
HDDs and
Flash-based SSDs. The
latter are the most popular type of SSDs employed by the military, aerospace,
industrial and embedded systems industries.
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Mortality Rate
Hard disk failure is a common occurrence in this age of desktops and notebooks. A lot of horror stories have been told, passed around and even published about how valuable data was lost and the agony of trying to retrieve or at least save a portion of the crashed hard drive. It is during this time that people wonder, why do hard disks fail? The reason is simple - wear and tear. Just like any good old machine with mechanical components, HDDs tend to deteriorate over time. HDDs consist of rotating, magnetically coated disks, known as platters, that are used to store data. This rotating motion of the mechanical arms results in much wear and tear after long periods of use. The operational lifespan of a computer HDD is typically over three years . A Flash-based SSD is different. Although the most common Flash chips have around 300,000 write cycles, the best Flash chips are rated at 1,000,000 write cycles per block. On top of that, Flash SSD manufacturers employ different ways to increase the longevity of the drives. In some cases, they use a "balancing" algorithm to monitor the number of times each disk block has been written, which greatly extends the operational lifespan of the drive. Furthermore, these manufacturers also designed special "wear-leveling" algorithms where once a certain percentage threshold for a given block is reached, the SSD controller will swap the data in that block with the data in another block that has exhibited a "read-only-like" characteristic in the background. This reduces performance lag and avoids further wearing off of the blocks and thrashing of the disk. Even with usage patterns of writing/reading gigabytes per day, a Flash-based SSD should last several years, depending on its capacity. Add to that the inclusion of a DRAM cache in the disk architecture that further enhances its operational capabilities as well as lifespan. (Editor's note see also:- article:- Increasing Flash Solid State Disk Reliability - which discusses the effectiveness of different wearout reduction algorithms built into SSD products). | ||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Speeding Up With the very fast paced lifestyle these days, most businesses are time-bound and cannot afford a slowing down in their transactions. This makes speed of HDDs a crucial point in technological purchases. The typical access time for a Flash based SSD is about 35 - 100 micro-seconds, whereas that of a rotating disk is around 5,000 - 10,000 micro-seconds. That makes a Flash-based SSD approximately 100 times faster than a rotating disk. This however raises another point - what's the benefit of a high-speed SSD when the entire system cannot support it? The evolution of CPUs in terms of performance has far surpassed the development of the data storage system. The HDD is actually limiting the potential of a computer system when they are not able to keep up with the performance of the other components, particularly the CPU. If an HDD is replaced by a high-speed SSD, the performance would significantly improve. The resulting system would be a high-powered set-up that can go beyond the demands of high-speed business or military environments. Size Matters To be a true plug-in replacement for HDDs, Flash-based SSDs are manufactured in standard 2.5" and 3.5" form factors. 2.5" SSDs are normally used in laptops or notebooks while the 3.5" form factors are used in desktops, or in JBOD or other SAN/NAS/DAS configurations. They can often be used to replace traditional disks in storage arrays or in a server's internal disk bays. Flash-based SSDs certainly fit the storage needs of most embedded systems that require much smaller form factors. Reliability In terms of reliability, conventional HDDs pale when compared to SSDs. The absence of mechanical arms and spinning platters is the reason behind its reliability. In demanding environments, SSDs provide the type of ruggedness required for mobile applications. Unlike the HDD, SSD's can withstand extreme shock and vibration with data integrity and without any danger of data loss. This feature is very important in industrial applications where exposure to highly combustible materials and electromagnetic radiation are typical. Their ability to deliver unnerving performance in extreme conditions also makes SSD play a vital role in military operations, be it in defense, aerospace or aviation applications. Military applications require, in most cases, an operating temperature range of -60°C to +95°C. Shock, vibration, and temperature ratings of HDDs cannot comply with military standards, only SSDs can. Power Play In addition to speed, reliability and mortality rate being positively affected by the SSD's non-volatility, they also consume much less power than traditional HDDs. No additional power is required to activate the platters or the mechanical arms present in most HDDs. Its power consumption is practically only a fraction of a hard disk drive. Heat Dissipation Along with the lower power consumption, there is also much lesser heat dissipation for systems using Flash-based SSDs as their data storage solution. This is due to the absence of heat generated from the rotating/movable media. This certainly proves to be the one of the main advantages of Flash-based SSDs relative to that of a traditional HDD. With less heat dissipation, it serves as the ideal data storage solution for mobile systems such as PDAs, notebooks, etc. Users can do away with large cooling fans, internal power supply and batteries for large storage arrays in storage area networks. (Editor's note:- an earlier article by BiTMICRO shows how the size and power advantages of flash SSDs could benefit Blades in server farms.) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Cost Considerations |
| |||||||||||||||||
The industry is also expecting more breakthroughs as higher
memory capacities and faster performance are now being produced for a wider
array of choices fit for any mission-critical application. ...Later:- 2 years after publishing the above article How Solid is Hard Disk's Future? Editor:- August 1, 2007 - STORAGEsearch.com today published a new article called - "How Solid is Hard Disk's Future?" What impact will the fast growing solid state disk market have on the overall hard disk market? - is a question I've been asked a lot recently. Most of the articles published here on STORAGEsearch.com are written from the SSD perspective. Is SSDs' gain really HDs' loss? - In some segments yes. But it's not a zero sum game. ...read the article ...Later:- 3 years after publishing the above article New SSD is a Zillion Times Faster than a Hard Drive Editor:- May 7, 2008 - in a new article published today on STORAGEsearch.com called - "How Much Hay Has Your Car Been Eating Lately?" I bemoan the tired old comparisons of server SSD IOPS to HDDs. SSDs have been around for long enough now to drop those clichéd comparisons from which we never learned anything very useful in the first place. ...read the article | ||||||||||||||||||
| . | ||||||||||||||||||
| 1.0" SSDs | 1.8" SSDs | 2.5" SSDs | 3.5" SSDs | rackmount SSDs | PCIe SSDs | SATA SSDs |
| SSDs all | flash SSDs | hybrid drives | flash memory | RAM SSDs | SAS SSDs | Fibre-Channel SSDs |
StorageSearch.com is published by ACSL