|
|
- editor's comments:- one of the world's top 10 storage companies by revenue,
Seagate is the world's largest manufacturer of
hard drives.
Its
revenue for the most recent 4 quarters ended March 28, 2008 were $12.54 billion.
That's a 12% increase compared to the same 4 quarters in the year ago
period. But revenue growth in the most recent quarter had dropped to 10% - which
may be a sign that the company is losing market share.
Although parts
of the hard disk market are under attack from
solid state disks - I've
discussed in my article
How Solid is
Hard Disk's Future? - why I think this factor will not seriously threaten
hard disk market growth for the next few years. But in the much longer term -
solid state storage is a threat.
Seagate has reacted to the SSD market
opportunity and threat in 3 significant ways.
1 - Hybrid Hard Disks
In January 2007 - the company, along with many other hard disk oems launched the
Hybrid Storage Alliance an
international group dedicated to communicating the benefits of hybrid
hard drive /
flash technology to
computer makers and end users. Although
Samsung was the first
company to demonstrate a commercial prototype
hybrid
hard disk in May 2006.
Seagate's own
Momentus
5400 PSD Laptop Hybrid Drives is a typical example of how the company is
meeting the flash challenge - with a feeble 256 megabytes of flash supporting a
160G byte hard drive.
My own view is that hybrid flash hard disks fail
to meet the SSD performance challenge in both consumer and enterprise
applications. And I don't expect this product category to be successful. That
view hasn't changed since the concept was first mooted.
2 - Seagate
Branded SSDs
In August 2007 - Seagate announced it would launch a
genuine solid state disk product sometime in 2008.
There has been much
speculation about whether this will be done by rebadging, in-house design or
acquiring an SSD oem.
Whichever route is taken - I predict that
Seagate will almost certainly fail to achieve significant long term
market share in the SSD market. The main reasons for Seagate's SSD failure will
be:-
- insufficient enthusiasm to develop the new SSD business at a time when the
hard disk market is still growing - also dampened by disillusion with hybrid
products by that time.
Why should Seagate invest manufacturing
resources in an industry where in February 2008
iSuppli
said flash prices were already dropping below costs and the overcrowded
market for 2.5" flash
SSDs points towards an upcoming costly shake-out?
- unwillingness to kill off its own profitable hard disk products by
introducing new SSD products aggressively (a hesitation which its competitors
will not have)
- lack of corporate management skills - which are different when you're
competing as a newcomer in a multi-vendor fast changing market like SSDs -
compared to the sluggish manufacturing led pace in the decades old hard disk
market - when you're the main encumbant.
3 - Using its
Patent IP to Sue and then License SSD oems
Instead of losing money
on every flash SSD it sells a better option for Seagate is to deter SSDs
which threaten its market with lawsuits related to its vast patent IP. This
technique suffocated a serious challenge earlier this decade which came from a
startup hard disk maker called
Cornice.
The
patent threat will fail to stem the SSD tide, but if there is enough revenue in
the flash SSD market, Seagate may calculate it will make some money milking it
for "technology licenses".
There are good precedents for "technology
taxes". At some periods
in
the 1990s chipmaker Texas Instruments earned more profits from patents than
it did from selling its own chips.
Apparently going down this route -
in April 2008 -
Seagate filed suit
against STEC alleging
patent infringements related to hard disk interfaces.
You can see what
some other SSD analysts have to say on this subject in these article links.
Gregory
Wong, at Forward Insights says
"It's
hard to see the financial motivation behind such a move..."
Jim
Handy, at Objective Analysis looks at the weight of the patent arsenal but
says that SSD Purchasers shouldn't worry.
"In such
dealings the plaintiff (Seagate in this case) usually will try to collect
somewhat equivalent royalties from all players.."
Don
Clark reminds us of an earlier patent dispute in the HDD market
"that
Rodime began in 1992, which ended after Seagate agreed to pay the Scottish
company $45 million in 2000..."
...Later:- STEC
dismissed the Seagate claims in these terms.
STEC is one of the first
companies to build (flash) SSDs, having designed, manufactured and shipped SSDs
as early as 1994, long before any of the suggested patents were issued to
Seagate.
Given the
effect SSDs
are having on the HDD market, STEC believes that Seagate's lawsuit is
completely without merit and primarily motivated by competitive concerns rather
than a desire to protect its intellectual property.
STEC believes
that Seagate's action is a desperate move to disrupt how aggressively customers
are embracing STEC's Zeus-IOPS technology and changing the balance of power in
enterprise storage. Seagate is sending a clear signal that it recognizes
STEC as the leader in the
SSD business and is attempting to slow down part of the growth that STEC is
gaining through its SSD offering, particularly in the enterprise segment. STEC
will aggressively pursue its defense to this infringement action.
See also
Charting the
Rise of the Solid State Disk Market | |
|
Seagate is the worldwide leader in the design, manufacture and
marketing of hard disk
drives, providing products
for a wide-range of applications, including Enterprise, Desktop, Mobile
Computing, Consumer Electronics and Branded Solutions. Seagate's business model
leverages technology leadership and world-class manufacturing to deliver
industry-leading innovation and quality to its global customers, with the goal
of being the low cost producer in all markets in which it participates. The
company is committed to providing award-winning products, customer support and
reliability to meet the world's growing demand for information storage. Seagate
can be found around the globe and at www.seagate.com. |
| see also:-
Seagate
- editor mentions on STORAGEsearch |
|
|
|
| Are MLC SSDs Safe
in Enterprise Apps? |
This is a follow up
article to the popular
SSD Myths and
Legends which, in early 2007, demolished the myth that flash memory
wear-out (a comfort blanket beloved by many
RAM SSD makers)
precluded the use of flash in heavy duty datacenters.
This new
article, published in Feb 2008, looks at the risks posed by MLC Nand Flash
SSDs which have recently hatched from their breeeding ground as chip modules
in cellphones and morphed into
hard disk form
factors. |
 |
It starts down a familiar
lane but an unexpected technology twist (which arrived in my email this
morning) takes you to a startling new world of possibilities. ...read the article | | | |
|