|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
the Solid State Disks Buyers Guide - 2005click here for the current SSD Buyers Guideby Zsolt Kerekes editor -December 21, 2005 StorageSearch.com is the leading publication covering the SSD market and we have regular contact with most vendors. As in previous years - I contacted every manufacturer of SSDs and visited every SSD web site in October and early November 2005 to compile data for this article and I also datamined the SSD news stories from the past year. |
![]() |
| ||
| .. |
| |||||
|
| ||||
| |||||
|
| |||||
| Solid State Disks by Form Factor - Part 1 - Classic HDD Types | |||
| 72.4% of SSD users surveyed said that traditional hard disk packages are the most suitable for their requirements. | |||
| 1.8" | 2.5" | 3.5" | rackmount |
| Memtech M-Systems PQI Samsung Electronics SMART Modular Technologies |
Adtron BiTMICRO Networks Afaya Altec ComputerSysteme GalaxyStor Hagiwara Sys-Com Memtech M-Systems Pretec Electronics PQI Samsung Electronics SiliconSystems SimpleTech SMART Modular Technologies Targa Systems Division Unigen Winstation Systems |
Adtron Altec ComputerSysteme BiTMICRO Networks Curtis Gnutek Hagiwara Sys-Com Memtech M-Systems SimpleTech |
Asine BiTMICRO Networks Broadbus Curtis Fuji Xerox Imperial Technology SEEK Systems Solid Access Technologies Solid Data Systems Taejin Infotech Texas Memory Systems TiGi Vanguard Rugged Storage ViON |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
| Solid State Disks by Interface - Part 2 | |||
| The Infiniband market took many more years to gain user acceptance than analysts had predicted. Texas Memory Systems demonstrated the first SSDs with native InfiniBand in Q405, and customer shipments are expected in January 2006. | |||
| iSCSI | NAS | InfiniBand | FireWire |
| BiTMICRO Networks | BiTMICRO Networks Taejin Infotech Targa Systems Division |
BiTMICRO Networks Texas Memory Systems |
Altec ComputerSysteme BiTMICRO Networks |
|
| ||||
| How Much Do Solid State Disks Cost? | ||||
|
| |||
|
| ||||
| Solid State Disks on Cards by Bus Type | ||||
| Only 17.2% of SSD users said that a computer bus interface or host bus adapter format suited their requirements. PCMCIA, SD and other consumer Flash Memory cards have capacities which overlap with low end SSDs, but they are too slow for most SSD applications. | ||||
| chip / PCB module | PCI | compactPCI | PMC | VMEbus |
| Afaya BiTMICRO Networks M-Systems SanDisk Silicon Storage Technology SiliconSystems White Electronic Designs |
BiTMICRO Networks Cenatek GIGA-BYTE Technology Micro Memory Taejin Infotech |
Adtron Asine BiTMICRO Networks Targa Systems Division Vanguard Rugged Storage |
Asine BiTMICRO Networks Curtiss-Wright Vanguard Rugged Storage |
Asine BiTMICRO Networks Targa Systems Division Vanguard Rugged Storage |
|
Solid State Disks by Memory Type | |||||||||||
| All SSDs in
the market today use either RAM
or flash memory as the
primary storage media.
RAM based SSDs have been around for decades. They rely on batteries to retain data when power is lost. Some models, such as those from Texas Memory Systems, also include internal hard disk drives to which data is saved under battery power, so that data is not lost when the battery runs down. This hybrid technology means that RAM based SSDs are more bulky than flash counterparts and RAM SSDs are unable to operate in the same range of hostile environments as flash products. RAM based SSDs are mostly used in enterprise server speedup applications. The fastest RAM SSDs are faster than the fastest flash SSDs. Flash based SSDs use non volatile semiconductor technology to store data, and do not need any batteries to retain data when they are unpowered. Because they have no moving parts they are inherently more reliable than hard disks and use less operating power. Flash SSDs can operate in hostile environments including industrial, military and even outer space applications. Flash SSDs are physically smaller than RAM SSDs. The densest flash SSD products available today offer nearly the same storage capacity in 2.5 inch form factors as hard drives. The fastest flash SSDs can offer random IOPs which are 10 to 50 times as fast as 15k RPM hard disks, and this makes them also suitable for enterprise server speedup applications. One disadvantage, compared to RAM SSDs is that flash has an intrinsic limit on the total number of write cycles to a particular destination. The limit varies, according to manufacturer but is over millions of cycles in the most durable products. Internal controllers within the flash SSD manage this phenomenon and can reallocate physical media transparently to prolong media life. In most applications, high endurance flash SSDs can have a reliable operating life which is typically 3 times as high as that of a hard drive. But I would hesitate about installing a flash SSD as a server speedup in a university maths research department, for example, or in other applications where the ratio of data writes to data reads is unusually high. |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
| STORAGEsearch is published by ACSL |